Leadership retreats and decision-making
What activities improve team decision-making?
For Managers, project teams, leadership groups, and facilitators
- Last updated
- Reading goal
- Choose activities that reveal and practice decision processes
Planning answer
Activities improve team decision-making when they make the process observable: people form an initial view, share different information, compare criteria, make one decision, and reflect on how it changed. Useful formats include individual-then-team ranking, hidden-information cases, premortems, scenario prioritization, decision journals, and red-team review. The activity should practice a specific behavior and end with a debrief; a clever puzzle or high score alone is not evidence of better decisions.
Decisions to settle
- Capture independent views before open discussion.
- Give different participants information the group must combine.
- Require decision criteria and reasons, not only a vote.
- Debrief how information and influence moved through the group.
Which decision-making activities are most useful?
| Activity | Behavior practiced | Simple format |
|---|---|---|
| Individual-then-team ranking | Independent judgment and revision | Rank alone, agree one team order, compare reasons |
| Hidden-information case | Information pooling | Distribute different facts, then require one explanation |
| Premortem | Risk identification | Assume the plan failed and list plausible causes independently |
| Scenario prioritization | Tradeoffs under constraints | Choose actions with limited time or resources |
| Decision journal | Calibration and learning | Record choice, assumptions, confidence, and review date |
| Red-team review | Constructive challenge | Assign a group to test assumptions and failure modes |
Swipe or use the left and right arrow keys to see more
Group-decision research shows why independent input matters: discussion does not automatically pool all the information held by members, and early consensus can hide unique evidence. An individual-first phase gives each participant a reasoned starting point before social influence increases.Royal Society Open Science
How do you facilitate the practice?
Name one behavior
Choose information-sharing, criteria, dissent, escalation, prioritization, or revision. Do not try to fix every aspect of decisions in one activity.
Give everyone thinking time
Ask for notes, a preliminary choice, or a confidence estimate before the first person speaks.
Require an explicit team output
The group should state the decision, criteria, important assumptions, dissent, and what new information would change the choice.
Introduce a useful change
Add one constraint or new fact and observe whether the group revisits its criteria or merely defends the first answer.
Debrief the mechanism
Ask when useful information entered, whose view changed, what remained unspoken, and which practice should transfer to real meetings.
A controlled meta-analysis of teamwork training found positive effects on teamwork and performance across multiple intervention methods. Its findings support deliberate practice and reflection, but they do not show that one activity permanently changes a team or that a game score predicts workplace outcomes.PLOS ONE
How can you tell whether the activity helped?
- Participants can name the decision criteria before debating options.
- Unique information is invited and summarized before convergence.
- The team records assumptions and identifies what would change its mind.
- Dissent is acknowledged in the decision record rather than erased.
- A later real meeting uses the same practice without facilitator prompting.
Use the result to examine process, not people
Decision Challenge asks each person to rank first, then asks the group to negotiate one team ranking. The reveal gives the facilitator a concrete way to discuss revision, influence, and reasoning.
The score compares answers inside the scenario. Use it to discuss the decision process, never to rate intelligence, leadership potential, or team effectiveness.
Sources and limits
The cited research supports deliberate teamwork practice, not diagnosis of a particular team. We rechecked Ocean Survival and the scoring explanation on August 29, 2026.
- Making Better Decisions in GroupsRoyal Society Open Science, 2017. Research synthesis on independent judgment, information pooling, and group decision processes.
- The Effectiveness of Teamwork Training on Teamwork Behaviors and Team PerformancePLOS ONE, 2017. A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled teamwork interventions across varied settings.